Anonymized Use Case · Cleaning & Soft FM

Nobody chose 30 toilet paper suppliers. They just couldn't see them.

In one cleaning business, 30 different suppliers invoiced for toilet paper within twelve months. Illustrative data, based on a real pattern in soft FM procurement - not a named client engagement.

The decision, once it's visible

Every line classified, the pattern was visible in days: here they are, cost, quality, and brand side by side, and the three worth keeping.

Supplier£/rollWhy
Gompels£0.31Bulk price leader
Bunzl CHS£0.33Contracted, Tork & Katrin
Pattersons£0.38Regional next-day cover
Amazon£0.41Spot buys, no terms

30 suppliers found across twelve months. Three worth keeping, once the spend was classified and put side by side - yours to make, the table makes it obvious.

Off-contract buying

Contracted price, through Bunzl: £19.20 for a case of 36 rolls. Actually paid, through Amazon: £26.80 for the same case - 40% more. A cost risk and a compliance risk: client contracts specify products and suppliers, and every off-contract line weakens your position at renegotiation.

Same roll, five prices

The same product, Tork Advanced T4, priced per roll across five suppliers:

SupplierPrice paid per roll
Supplier A£0.31
Supplier B£0.36
Supplier C£0.41
Supplier D£0.47
Supplier E£0.52

A 68% spread on the same product - invisible, line by line, until classified.

Your data doesn’t need to be clean

Messy data is the starting point. Cleaning and classifying it is the product.

AI-first, human reviewed

Every label checked. Classification holds up as new suppliers and invoices arrive.

Usage-based pricing

You pay for the lines processed. No heavy annual subscription.

They classified thousands of product lines in under a week. That would have taken our team six months.

David TorrCEO, FARO

Typical result in soft FM: 10-20% savings on addressable spend. The findings above are where it comes from.

Want to see this on your own spend?

Send a sample of your own invoice data and we'll show you the same kind of pattern in your own numbers.

Explore cases

Laatste inzichten

Procurement

UNSPSC vs eCl@ss: when your ERP and reporting disagree

UNSPSC and eCl@ss answer different questions. Here is how to pick when your ERP was built for one an…

Lees meer
AI & Digital

Why a data-cleaning AI project needs a project manager

Most AI data-cleaning projects fail from a governance gap, not a model gap. Treating the software li…

Lees meer
Data Quality

When manufacturer and type fields swap in your spend data

A silent field swap between manufacturer and type corrupts classification without a single error mes…

Lees meer