Rules and machine learning
Supplier-specific rules and a machine learning layer trained on your own spend handle the clear majority of lines immediately, the way your most experienced buyer would.
Most procurement teams can state their turnover to the euro. Few can state what they actually spent it on, category by category, across every site, entity, and bundled contract. Pearstop builds that baseline, so a negotiation, a tender, or a framework review starts from a real number instead of a guess.
Ask a head of commercial to defend what a bundled contract costs, service line by service line, and the honest answer is often a guess dressed up as a number. The same gap shows up a level higher. A construction group turning over hundreds of millions across a dozen entities can state its revenue to the euro and still not know, with any precision, what it spent last year or on what, because spend sits in different systems, coded differently, entity by entity.
“We say, well how much is this going to be. And we go, it feels like it should be three percent of the contract value. But in real terms that could be six or that could be two. We don’t know.”
Head of Commercial, multi-site cleaning services contractor

Most lines never need a human look at them. The ones that do feed back into the system, so the review queue gets shorter, not the same size, every month.
Supplier-specific rules and a machine learning layer trained on your own spend handle the clear majority of lines immediately, the way your most experienced buyer would.
Ambiguous descriptions, multilingual line items, and one-off suppliers are resolved by a large language model with broad product and industry knowledge, not guessed at.
Anything still below a confidence threshold is flagged for your team, typically an hour or so a week. Every decision feeds back into the engine.
Real spend, by category, across every site and entity. Not last year’s estimate.
Defend a renewal or a client challenge with a cost and performance record for each service, not one blended number.
See where live buying has drifted from an agreement signed years ago, across the whole business, not just the categories someone happens to be watching.
You cannot negotiate what you cannot see. Savings come third.
Procurement data quality is whether spend data, across invoices, purchase orders, and supplier records, is accurate and consistent enough to add up. For infrastructure, construction, and FM organisations buying across many sites, entities, and bundled contracts, poor data quality means nobody can state a real baseline to negotiate or tender from. Pearstop automates the cleaning and classification of procurement data for companies like Strukton, processing over 35,000 lines a month, so spend is visible by category, framework compliance is checked against live buying, and group-wide spend adds up to one number instead of several conflicting ones.
Most classification systems rely on historical data to learn from. Pearstop combines rule-based assignment, machine learning, and an LLM layer that draws on broad product and industry knowledge, so it performs strongly even without existing priors.
Yes. Buyers review flagged items in a dedicated queue, typically one hour per week. Every decision they make trains the system further, reducing the review queue over time until manual input approaches zero.
Yes. Once spend is classified consistently, current buying can be compared against the framework agreements already in place, category by category, so drift shows up as it happens rather than at the next audit.
Book a 7-minute discovery call. We will show you exactly where your spend data is hiding the number you need.