Procurement

You cannot negotiate what you cannot see.

Most procurement teams can state their turnover to the euro. Few can state what they actually spent it on, category by category, across every site, entity, and bundled contract. Pearstop builds that baseline, so a negotiation, a tender, or a framework review starts from a real number instead of a guess.

Send us a sample

Send a representative sample of your invoice lines — up to 200 lines, or a handful of invoices (max 10) — and we'll classify them to show you exactly how it works. No cost, no commitment.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Talk to sales
Line as enteredPMP FLTR 20X24 CS/6
As enteredCategoryUNSPSC
PMP FLTR 20X24 CS/6Air filters40161505
FILTER,AIR,20X24,MERV8Air filters40161505
GEN PURP CLNR 5LGeneral purpose cleaners47131805
Additional hoursTemporary manual labour80111613
The Problem

One number at the top. No detail underneath.

Most companies are flying blind, and only find out when someone asks a question they cannot answer.
Procurement Lead, Infrastructure

Ask a head of procurement what they spent last year and they can usually give you a number to the euro. Ask what it was actually spent on - category by category, site by site, supplier by supplier - and the answer gets vague fast. The same gap shows up a level higher. A construction group turning over hundreds of millions across a dozen entities can state its revenue to the euro and still not have real granularity on what it bought or from whom, because spend sits in different systems, coded differently, entity by entity.

  • Total spend known at a high level, but not broken down by category, site, or supplier with enough granularity to act on
  • Framework agreements signed years ago, with no live comparison against what is actually being bought today
  • Group-wide spend spread across entities and systems, so nobody can add it up precisely
  • High-level totals that look fine in a board pack but cannot answer a specific question about one category or one site
The Problem

Three layers handle classification. Your team handles judgment.

Most lines never need a human look at them. The ones that do feed back into the system, so the review queue gets shorter, not the same size, every month.

1

Rules and machine learning

Supplier-specific rules and a machine learning layer trained on your own spend handle the clear majority of lines immediately, the way your most experienced buyer would.

2

LLM layer for the edge cases

Ambiguous descriptions, multilingual line items, and one-off suppliers are resolved by a large language model with broad product and industry knowledge, not guessed at.

3

Human review, then it remembers

Anything still below a confidence threshold is flagged for your team, typically an hour or so a week. Every decision feeds back into the engine.

What a real spend baseline makes possible

A baseline to negotiate and tender from

Real spend, by category, across every site and entity. Not last year's estimate.

Bundled contracts broken out by service line

Defend a renewal or a client challenge with a cost and performance record for each service, not one blended number.

Framework compliance checked, not assumed

See where live buying has drifted from an agreement signed years ago, across the whole business, not just the categories someone happens to be watching.

Off-contract spend in plain sight

Spend with suppliers outside your frameworks or approved list shows up by category, so compliance gaps are found before an audit finds them.
“You cannot negotiate what you cannot see. Savings come third.”
CFO, Infrastructure and rail contractor

What is procurement data quality and why does it matter?

Procurement data quality is whether spend data, across invoices, purchase orders, and supplier records, is accurate and consistent enough to add up. For infrastructure, construction, and FM organisations buying across many sites, entities, and bundled contracts, poor data quality means nobody can state a real baseline to negotiate or tender from. Pearstop automates the cleaning and classification of procurement data at any scale, from a few hundred lines a month to hundreds of thousands, so spend is visible by category, framework compliance is checked against live buying, and group-wide spend adds up to one number instead of several conflicting ones.

Questions

Frequently asked

What happens if we do not have existing classification data to train from?

Most classification systems rely on historical data to learn from. Pearstop combines rule-based assignment, machine learning, and an LLM layer that draws on broad product and industry knowledge, so it performs strongly even without existing priors.

Will our buyers still be in control?

Yes. Buyers review flagged items in a dedicated queue, typically one hour per week. Every decision they make trains the system further, reducing the review queue over time until manual input approaches zero.

Can Pearstop check our buying against existing framework agreements?

Yes. Once spend is classified consistently, current buying can be compared against the framework agreements already in place, category by category, so drift shows up as it happens rather than at the next audit.

Ready to build a real spend baseline?

Talk to sales. We will show you exactly where your spend data is hiding the number you need.

Send us a sample

Send a representative sample of your invoice lines — up to 200 lines, or a handful of invoices (max 10) — and we'll classify them to show you exactly how it works. No cost, no commitment.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Talk to sales

Latest Insights

Procurement

A UNSPSC treemap exposes tail spend before it costs you

Pair a UNSPSC category treemap with an on-contract vs tail-spend bar chart to see where procurement …

Read more
AI & Digital

Why a general AI tool failed our classification problem

A general-purpose AI tool hallucinated categories at volume and lost consistency across thousands of…

Read more
Asset Management

The expired supplier certificate nobody noticed

A supplier certificate lapsed six months ago and nobody caught it. Here is why compliance tracking f…

Read more